|
Friday, August 14, 2009 - 5:54 PM
Bentley had
come with a wealth of knowledge, but little else. That did not mean
that the Bentley case was a failure. 27 government employees had been
identified by Bentley as Soviet agents and 21 non-government employees.
The case had led the Bureau to nine subjects about whom it had
previously not had any information, one of whom worked in the
government. And it provided strong corroboration of the bona fides of
Whittaker Chambers and confirmation of earlier Bureau investigative
conclusions.
In the end, a case summary was turned over to the Department of Justice for consideration of whether or not to prosecute. [5] Within
days, a senior Justice Department official had leaked information about
the case to the press, destroying any chance to continue it as a
counterintelligence investigation. The Bureau was furious. Attorney
General Clark told the Bureau that he knew who the leaker was and that
the problem would not repeat itself; it did, but that problem is for
another paper. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire Clark then asked the Bureau which of three approaches
should be taken with the case: 1) continue it as an intelligence
operation; 2) openly interrogate a select number of principles; or 3)
furnish individual departments with evidence of the conspiracy
sufficient to dismiss those Soviet agents still in federal employ?
Hoover
assigned the matter to his Executive Conference, but didn't think much
would come of the case. The Conference agreed. The case could no longer
be continued as an intelligence investigation as all of the subjects
were "very security conscious." Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire Furthermore, due to publicity, the
effective interrogation of select principles had been compromised by
the leaks. Prosecuting the matter successfully was also unlikely.
In the end, the AG decided to have the Bureau interview the principals
with the hope that better evidence could be developed. Even before the
Bureau followed through on the AG's orders, the effects of the Bureau's
investigation and the subsequent leaks to the press began having an
impact. In February, Alger Hiss left the Federal government for the
Carnegie foundation and the next month Harry Dexter White left the
International Monetary Fund. By mid-April, the FBI had conducted many
of the interviews of targets in the Gregory Case, most of them on the
same day, but "no material admissions were obtained" from the subjects
and by the end of spring, Justice had adopted a new tactic: the Federal
grand jury of the Southern District of New York. In the end, this
tactic won two convictions, Alger Hiss and William Remington, both for
perjury.
While
the grand jury began to call witnesses, significant changes were
occurring in American intelligence. On July 26, President Truman signed
the National Security Act creating the Central Intelligence Agency and
an American Intelligence Community. Under this new law, domestic
counterintelligence remained with the Bureau. Other aspects of
intelligence work also remained outside of the new CIA, specifically
the Army's cryptanalytic efforts. One of these efforts, Venona, had
begun several years earlier, but it is with what happened at the
beginning of September that we are concerned.
|